out of curiosity...
Aug. 15th, 2013 03:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
in fandoms where people have faces (like for example movie fandoms, tv series fandoms and the like), how important is the attractiveness of the characters for you to ship them together?
i was thinking of this because of
kitty_fic's post about OTP feels. i've not responded to that post yet, but it did get me thinking of who my OTPs are and why they're my OTPs and how many OTPs i have in a given fandom, and it made me realise that...:
in text-based fandoms (like harry potter or the volstovic cycle), i have a million OTPs. i don't think much about what the characters look like, because my imagination takes care of that, and in my imagination, everyone i ship in some capacity or other, is attractive according to my standards.
and then there are visual fandoms (like bbc sherlock) where i don't have any OTPs and don't really ship john/sherlock - not for lack of subtext (or text, as is), but because to me, john watson is not attractive and picturing him with sherlock is outright unpleasant (there's also the part where i view sherlock as an asexual character and putting him in a sexual relationship with someone puts me off). i realised that part of why i don't want to get into certain fandoms or watch the canon, is because the people in the ship are unattractive/unappealing to me. i have fewer OTPs and fewer OTP constellations in these fandoms.
obviously shipping is about more than looks, but how much do looks influence the ship you choose? are you able to get into a ship despite (or because?) one or both characters are unattractive to you?
poll! i know the questions are biased, but i didn't want to overthink how to phrase them as neutrally as possible.
[Poll #1929233][Poll #1929233]
i was thinking of this because of
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
in text-based fandoms (like harry potter or the volstovic cycle), i have a million OTPs. i don't think much about what the characters look like, because my imagination takes care of that, and in my imagination, everyone i ship in some capacity or other, is attractive according to my standards.
and then there are visual fandoms (like bbc sherlock) where i don't have any OTPs and don't really ship john/sherlock - not for lack of subtext (or text, as is), but because to me, john watson is not attractive and picturing him with sherlock is outright unpleasant (there's also the part where i view sherlock as an asexual character and putting him in a sexual relationship with someone puts me off). i realised that part of why i don't want to get into certain fandoms or watch the canon, is because the people in the ship are unattractive/unappealing to me. i have fewer OTPs and fewer OTP constellations in these fandoms.
obviously shipping is about more than looks, but how much do looks influence the ship you choose? are you able to get into a ship despite (or because?) one or both characters are unattractive to you?
poll! i know the questions are biased, but i didn't want to overthink how to phrase them as neutrally as possible.
[Poll #1929233][Poll #1929233]
no subject
Date: 2013-08-15 02:25 pm (UTC)And aren't the most popular pairings out there pretty much white dudes? Granted, there are more white dudes than women or other races but usually fangirls are pretty good with making impossible pairings possible. I think that part of this is what we/the media deem attractive.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-15 04:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-15 06:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-15 06:50 pm (UTC)First off, to me "attractive" is often in the proverbial eye of the proverbial beholder. So people who might be attractive to me, are not always attractive to others and visa versa.
Second, in certain fandoms (HP/LOTR, etc.) that are both text-based and visual, there is a great deal of conflation. I don't think that Tolkien ever described the majority of his characters as being especially attractive, though many were in the movies. JKR describes only a rare few as being attractive (Cho and Madame Rosemerta, who are not very major and Sirius who may have lost that beauty), but the movies show us some people (Neville, Draco, Lucius, Luna, even Snape to an extent, etc.) who were never described as good looking, but very much are in the movies. So, as you pointed out it's all about your imagination.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-15 10:16 pm (UTC)This is very much how I feel, Sherlock is in some sense above the whole relationship thing, he's got more important things on his mind;)
When I saw your questions, I thought "I don't need to find the characters attractive in order to ship them, do I..?"
But then I thought about the pairings I ship and have shipped (which aren't an enormous number, but still), and I couldn't think of a single one where I didn't find them at least reasonably attractive. So hmm, I guess that may be more important to me than I thought, even if it of course isn't enough ^ _ ^
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-15 10:16 pm (UTC)In terms of a more visual fandom, I think the same analysis still applies for me. I don't have to find a character visually appealing, it's all about whether they have a spark with the character I am shipping them with that matters. They could be conventionally attractive or not, it's all about their relationship with the other half of the 'ship' that gives me all the feels.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-15 10:22 pm (UTC)And as you said, if it's characters from a book, I really don't mind so much - I'll picture them however I like anyway!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-16 01:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-16 01:37 am (UTC)Yeah, I pretty much have to find them attractive to care enough to ship them.
One instance that sticks out in my mind is Severus Snape. I don't find movie Severus attractive necessarily, but my 'headcanon' snape is ;D Maybe not in a traditional way - but just enough for my tastes :D
I think it's different for HP though... because it was a book canon first. I think with tv or movie-only canon it's harder to separate the character from the person you see on screen.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-16 02:23 am (UTC)Ugh, that sounds terrible and cliched. But good looking people in tv or movies annoy me. We see too many of them. It's the ones with good writing and fascinating personalities that I fall in love with and ship. (For example, I fell in love with a very unusual ship from Inception right away, and then began liking the 'attractive' ship later.)
So, yes. Attractive. I just have different criteria.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2013-08-21 07:14 am (UTC)I usually draw fanart for the fandoms I'm active in, and I love book fandoms better for that because I can make anyone look whatever I want them to. There was actually a time when I tried to draw characters 'ugly' because that makes them more interesting for me. Movie/TV series fandoms, on the other hand... well, you have to make them look like a particular face, and it's more limiting.
On the other hand, one of the reasons why I can't watch Teen Wolf is because I find most of the people there blandly good-looking. They're not interesting for me at all, so I don't find them attractive. Not that I need to have all characters attractive for me to watch the show, but I feel like one of the selling points of Teen Wolf is that viewers find the actors and the actresses attractive, and it's not working for me.
I'm not making any sense at all. >.>
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: